Places workers at client sites

I2U Systems Inc

I2U Systems Inc files as a staffing employer. 2 client companies are named as secondary worksite employers across its 9 LCA filings, which means the people it sponsors mostly work somewhere other than its own office.

New positions, FY2026
0

Positions filed as NEW employment in the latest filed fiscal year — the closest honest read on new people being sponsored.

Lifetime filings
9

Labor condition applications across every fiscal year in the corpus.

FY2026 – FY2026

Worker positions
9

Positions on those applications — NOT people and NOT visas granted. A worker renewed three times counts three times.

Median offered wage
$111,875

Derived at read time from the $5,000 wage bands, across every occupation.

9 disclosed positions

Employer of record

The entity exactly as it appears on the filings. This name is the entity — nothing here is combined with a similarly named company.

Name as filed
I2U Systems Inc
Address
7070 Knights Court Unit 803Missouri City, TX 77459UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Industry (NAICS)
541511Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Point of contact
Shilpa Shree SrinivasaHR Administrator
Declared status
H-1B dependent

Where the work actually happens

Client companies named as secondary worksite employers on this employer's applications.

Every client company named on a filing.
Secondary worksite employerFilings naming themShare of filings
The Vanguard Group Inc222.2%
McKesson111.1%

A secondary worksite employer is the company a sponsored worker is placed at. It is named on the application by I2U Systems Inc; it is not the sponsor, it did not file, and none of the numbers on this page belong to it. Each of these names is its own entity here, exactly as this one is.

Open jobs at this employer right now

The filing history is public record. Live postings are the other half, and none are matched to this employer today.

No open postings matched to this employer right now.

Track I2U Systems Inc while you job hunt. SubmitX watches new postings at sponsors like this one and fills the applications for you.

Get started free

Roles filed

The job title is whatever the employer wrote on the application. Nothing is reclassified, and the wage band is derived from the $5,000 bands rather than read from a stored average.

Filing by filing →
Positions are worker positions on the applications, not people — a renewal counts again.
Job title as filedSOC occupationFilingsPositionsOffered wage, 25th–75thPrevailing wage level
RPA Developer15-1252.00Software Developers22$110,938$131,250median $113,125 · 7 disclosedLevel II6 of 7 positions
Business Data Analyst15-1211.00Computer Systems Analysts11$81,250$83,750median $82,500 · 1 disclosedLevel II1 of 1 positions
Data Engineer15-1252.00Software Developers11$110,938$131,250median $113,125 · 7 disclosedLevel II6 of 7 positions
DevOps Engineer15-1252.00Software Developers11$110,938$131,250median $113,125 · 7 disclosedLevel II6 of 7 positions
Software Engineer15-1252.00Software Developers11$110,938$131,250median $113,125 · 7 disclosedLevel II6 of 7 positions
Software/DevOps Engineer15-1252.00Software Developers11$110,938$131,250median $113,125 · 7 disclosedLevel II6 of 7 positions
Splunk Systems Engineer15-1299.08Computer Systems Engineers/Architects11$106,250$108,750median $107,500 · 1 disclosedLevel II1 of 1 positions
Splunk Systems Engineer15-1252.00Software Developers11$110,938$131,250median $113,125 · 7 disclosedLevel II6 of 7 positions

Worksites

Places of employment declared on the applications, ranked by how often they appear.

All 7 worksites →
Worksite addresses exactly as written on the application. Nothing is geocoded or corrected.
WorksiteCountyFilingsShare
Flanders, NJ4 Watson Way222.2%
Malvern, PA45 Liberty Blvd222.2%
Scottsdale, AZ5601 N Pima RdMARICOPA111.1%
Frisco, TX10758 Downy Cup Drive111.1%
Irving, TX8045 N MacArtur Blvd111.1%
Redmond, WA7435 159th Pl NE111.1%
Seattle, WA1735 Dexter Ave N, apt A205KING111.1%

Filing volume

Filings, worker positions and new-employment positions per fiscal year. Three different measurements, never added together.

One filing can declare many positions, and a continued-employment position is a worker already here being renewed — which is why position counts are never summed across fiscal years.
Fiscal yearFilingsWorker positionsNew-employment positions
FY2026Oct 2025 – Sep 2026990

Case status (filings)

BucketCountShare
Certified777.8%
Certified, then withdrawn222.2%

Petition type (positions)

BucketCountShare
Continued employment (renewal)555.6%
Amended petition444.4%

56% of this employer's petition-type positions are continued employment — the same worker renewed. That is why the headline figure above is new-employment positions rather than filings: an employer renewing the same staff every three years produces the same filing volume as one hiring that many new people, and the two are not the same opportunity.

Offered wages

Every disclosed offered wage on this employer's certified applications, in $5,000 bands.

Wages by occupation →
I2U Systems Inc — offered wage distributionI2U Systems Inc: wage distribution across 9 disclosed positions, from $80k to $155k, median $111,875.median $112k$80k$155k

25th $106,250 · median $111,875 · 75th $114,688 · 9 disclosed positions

Offered wages from certified Labor Condition Applications, grouped into $5,000 bands. Percentiles are computed from the bands, not from a stored average.

Outcomes

Derived at read time from the stored approval and denial counts. Nothing here is a stored rate.

Approval rate
100.0%

US Department of Labor decisions on the applications, not petition outcomes.

9 adjudicated

Approvals
9
Denials
0
Basis
DOL decisions

Two different measurements. They are never blended into one rate.

A certified-then-withdrawn application was approved and pulled afterwards, so it counts as an approval. An application withdrawn before a decision was never adjudicated and is excluded from the denominator entirely — counting it as a denial would invent a rejection that never happened.

Every figure above is aggregated from Labor Condition Applications published by the US Department of Labor for I2U Systems Inc as that name appears on the filings. Filing counts are applications, position counts are worker positions on those applications, and neither is a headcount or a count of visas granted. How these pages are built.

Looking for a different company with a similar name? Search every employer — same-named companies are listed separately, with the city and industry that tell them apart.