Places workers at client sites
Infoville Inc
Infoville Inc files as a staffing employer. 7 client companies are named as secondary worksite employers across its 12 LCA filings, which means the people it sponsors mostly work somewhere other than its own office.
- New positions, FY2026
- 0
- Lifetime filings
- 12
- Worker positions
- 12
- Median offered wage
- $107,500
Positions filed as NEW employment in the latest filed fiscal year — the closest honest read on new people being sponsored.
Labor condition applications across every fiscal year in the corpus.
FY2026 – FY2026
Positions on those applications — NOT people and NOT visas granted. A worker renewed three times counts three times.
Derived at read time from the $5,000 wage bands, across every occupation.
13 disclosed positions
Employer of record
The entity exactly as it appears on the filings. This name is the entity — nothing here is combined with a similarly named company.
- Name as filed
- Infoville Inc
- Address
- 2162 Route 206 Flr 2, Suite # 2Belle Mead, NJ 08502UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
- Phone
- +1 (908) 428-9050
- Industry (NAICS)
- 541511Computer Systems Design and Related Services
- Point of contact
- Siva SurapaneniPresident
- Declared status
- H-1B dependent
Where the work actually happens
Client companies named as secondary worksite employers on this employer's applications.
| Secondary worksite employer | Filings naming them | Share of filings |
|---|---|---|
| Home Office | 3 | 25.0% |
| Home Office (Tele commute) | 3 | 25.0% |
| Arconic Corp | 2 | 16.7% |
| Cisco Systems Inc | 1 | 8.3% |
| Coterra Energy Inc. | 1 | 8.3% |
| Oncur Electric(IBM) | 1 | 8.3% |
| Pitney Bows | 1 | 8.3% |
A secondary worksite employer is the company a sponsored worker is placed at. It is named on the application by Infoville Inc; it is not the sponsor, it did not file, and none of the numbers on this page belong to it. Each of these names is its own entity here, exactly as this one is.
Open jobs at this employer right now
The filing history is public record. Live postings are the other half, and none are matched to this employer today.
No open postings matched to this employer right now.
Track Infoville Inc while you job hunt. SubmitX watches new postings at sponsors like this one and fills the applications for you.
Get started freeRoles filed
The job title is whatever the employer wrote on the application. Nothing is reclassified, and the wage band is derived from the $5,000 bands rather than read from a stored average.
| Job title as filed | SOC occupation | Filings | Positions | Offered wage, 25th–75th | Prevailing wage level |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Software Developer | 15-1252.00Software Developers | 7 | 7 | $103,750 – $119,583median $115,833 · 9 disclosed | Level II8 of 9 positions |
| Senior Programmer Analyst | 15-1251.00Computer Programmers | 3 | 3 | $85,000 – $100,000median $95,000 · 4 disclosed | Level II3 of 4 positions |
| Programmer Analyst | 15-1251.00Computer Programmers | 1 | 1 | $85,000 – $100,000median $95,000 · 4 disclosed | Level II3 of 4 positions |
| Software Developer (Maximo) | 15-1252.00Software Developers | 1 | 1 | $103,750 – $119,583median $115,833 · 9 disclosed | Level II8 of 9 positions |
| Sr. Software Developer(Maximo Consultant) | 15-1252.00Software Developers | 1 | 1 | $103,750 – $119,583median $115,833 · 9 disclosed | Level II8 of 9 positions |
Worksites
Places of employment declared on the applications, ranked by how often they appear.
| Worksite | County | Filings | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Edison, NJ312 Rivendell Way | — | 2 | 15.4% |
| ALCOA, TN2300 North Wright Road | — | 2 | 15.4% |
| Milpitas, CA725 Alder Dr | — | 1 | 7.7% |
| Shelton, CT27 Waterview Dr | — | 1 | 7.7% |
| Saint Johns, FL159 Elm Branch Rd | — | 1 | 7.7% |
| Naperville, IL4144 Heart leaf Ln | — | 1 | 7.7% |
| Dallas, TX1616 Woodall Rodgers Fwy | — | 1 | 7.7% |
| Houston, TX840 Gessner Rd, | — | 1 | 7.7% |
| Plano, TX300 Legacy dr, Saxony At Chase Oaks | — | 1 | 7.7% |
| Richardson, TXAPT #1533 2305 Plaza Blvd | — | 1 | 7.7% |
| Glen Allen, VA10919 Little Five Loop | — | 1 | 7.7% |
Filing volume
Filings, worker positions and new-employment positions per fiscal year. Three different measurements, never added together.
| Fiscal year | Filings | Worker positions | New-employment positions |
|---|---|---|---|
| FY2026Oct 2025 – Sep 2026 | 12 | 12 | 0 |
Case status (filings)
| Bucket | Count | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Certified | 13 | 100.0% |
Petition type (positions)
| Bucket | Count | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Continued employment (renewal) | 5 | 38.5% |
| Change of previous employment | 1 | 7.7% |
| Change of employer | 2 | 15.4% |
| Amended petition | 5 | 38.5% |
38% of this employer's petition-type positions are continued employment — the same worker renewed. That is why the headline figure above is new-employment positions rather than filings: an employer renewing the same staff every three years produces the same filing volume as one hiring that many new people, and the two are not the same opportunity.
Offered wages
Every disclosed offered wage on this employer's certified applications, in $5,000 bands.
25th $100,417 · median $107,500 · 75th $117,917 · 13 disclosed positions
Offered wages from certified Labor Condition Applications, grouped into $5,000 bands. Percentiles are computed from the bands, not from a stored average.
Outcomes
Derived at read time from the stored approval and denial counts. Nothing here is a stored rate.
- Approval rate
- 100.0%
- Approvals
- 13
- Denials
- 0
- Basis
- DOL decisions
US Department of Labor decisions on the applications, not petition outcomes.
13 adjudicated
Two different measurements. They are never blended into one rate.
A certified-then-withdrawn application was approved and pulled afterwards, so it counts as an approval. An application withdrawn before a decision was never adjudicated and is excluded from the denominator entirely — counting it as a denial would invent a rejection that never happened.
Every figure above is aggregated from Labor Condition Applications published by the US Department of Labor for Infoville Inc as that name appears on the filings. Filing counts are applications, position counts are worker positions on those applications, and neither is a headcount or a count of visas granted. How these pages are built.
Looking for a different company with a similar name? Search every employer — same-named companies are listed separately, with the city and industry that tell them apart.