Places workers at client sites
NEUMERIC TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION
NEUMERIC TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION files as a staffing employer. 9 client companies are named as secondary worksite employers across its 11 LCA filings, which means the people it sponsors mostly work somewhere other than its own office.
- New positions, FY2026
- 2
- Lifetime filings
- 11
- Worker positions
- 11
- Median offered wage
- $111,500
Positions filed as NEW employment in the latest filed fiscal year — the closest honest read on new people being sponsored.
Labor condition applications across every fiscal year in the corpus.
FY2026 – FY2026
Positions on those applications — NOT people and NOT visas granted. A worker renewed three times counts three times.
Derived at read time from the $5,000 wage bands, across every occupation.
11 disclosed positions
Employer of record
The entity exactly as it appears on the filings. This name is the entity — nothing here is combined with a similarly named company.
- Name as filed
- NEUMERIC TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION
- Address
- 590 ENTERPRISE DRIVE STE ALEWIS CENTER, OH 43035UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
- Phone
- +1 (614) 610-4999
- Industry (NAICS)
- 541511Computer Systems Design and Related Services
- Point of contact
- SUDHEER GADDAMCEO AND FOUNDER
- Declared status
- H-1B dependent
Where the work actually happens
Client companies named as secondary worksite employers on this employer's applications.
| Secondary worksite employer | Filings naming them | Share of filings |
|---|---|---|
| HOMESERVE | 2 | 18.2% |
| JP MORGAN CHASE | 1 | 9.1% |
| North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) | 1 | 9.1% |
| PLYMOUTH ROCK ASSURANCE | 1 | 9.1% |
| State of NC - DOT (Dept of Transportation) | 1 | 9.1% |
| THE VANGUARD GROUP | 1 | 9.1% |
| UNUM GROUP | 1 | 9.1% |
| VERIZON | 1 | 9.1% |
| WELLS FARGO | 1 | 9.1% |
A secondary worksite employer is the company a sponsored worker is placed at. It is named on the application by NEUMERIC TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION; it is not the sponsor, it did not file, and none of the numbers on this page belong to it. Each of these names is its own entity here, exactly as this one is.
Open jobs at this employer right now
3 live postings matched to this employer. These are job postings, not H-1B filings — nothing here says the role is sponsored.
Top Client Hiring:| Certified Power Platform Developer @ NC // F2F
Raleigh, North Carolina, USA
Posted todayvia dice
HYBRID; Mainframe Appl. Architect ; Raleigh, NC; Contract
Raleigh, North Carolina, USA
Posted 28 days agovia dice
Microsoft Certified Blazor UI Developer at Washington, DC - Hybrid role.
Washington, District of Columbia, USA
Posted 1 month agovia dice
Track NEUMERIC TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION while you job hunt. SubmitX watches new postings at sponsors like this one and fills the applications for you.
Get started freeRoles filed
The job title is whatever the employer wrote on the application. Nothing is reclassified, and the wage band is derived from the $5,000 bands rather than read from a stored average.
| Job title as filed | SOC occupation | Filings | Positions | Offered wage, 25th–75th | Prevailing wage level |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SOFTWARE ENGINEER | 15-1252.00Software Developers | 6 | 6 | $110,250 – $114,750median $112,500 · 9 disclosed | Level II6 of 9 positions |
| SENIOR INFORMATICA DEVELOPER | 15-1252.00Software Developers | 3 | 3 | $110,250 – $114,750median $112,500 · 9 disclosed | Level II6 of 9 positions |
| PRODUCT OWNER | 15-1299.09Information Technology Project Managers | 1 | 1 | $96,250 – $98,750median $97,500 · 1 disclosed | Level II1 of 1 positions |
| SOFTWARE TEST ENGINEER | 15-1253.00Software Quality Assurance Analysts and Testers | 1 | 1 | $101,250 – $103,750median $102,500 · 1 disclosed | Level II1 of 1 positions |
Worksites
Places of employment declared on the applications, ranked by how often they appear.
| Worksite | County | Filings | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| O'FALLON, MO1212 PRAIRIE POINT | — | 2 | 18.2% |
| WILSON, NC3701 ASHBROOK DR NW | — | 2 | 18.2% |
| TAMPA, FL18159 BRIDLE CLUB DR | — | 1 | 9.1% |
| OFALLON, MO1212 PRAIRIE POINT | — | 1 | 9.1% |
| CHARLOTTE, NC9531 UNIVERSITY TERRACE DR | — | 1 | 9.1% |
| EDISON, NJ319 MICHELLE CIR | — | 1 | 9.1% |
| DELAWARE, OH915 BLACKMORE DR | — | 1 | 9.1% |
| LEWIS CENTER, OH590 ENTERPRISE DRIVE | — | 1 | 9.1% |
| PAOLI, PA77 SOUTH VALLEY ROAD | — | 1 | 9.1% |
Filing volume
Filings, worker positions and new-employment positions per fiscal year. Three different measurements, never added together.
| Fiscal year | Filings | Worker positions | New-employment positions |
|---|---|---|---|
| FY2026Oct 2025 – Sep 2026 | 11 | 11 | 2 |
Case status (filings)
| Bucket | Count | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Certified | 7 | 63.6% |
| Certified, then withdrawn | 4 | 36.4% |
Petition type (positions)
| Bucket | Count | Share |
|---|---|---|
| New employment | 2 | 16.7% |
| Change of previous employment | 4 | 33.3% |
| Amended petition | 6 | 50.0% |
0% of this employer's petition-type positions are continued employment — the same worker renewed. That is why the headline figure above is new-employment positions rather than filings: an employer renewing the same staff every three years produces the same filing volume as one hiring that many new people, and the two are not the same opportunity.
Offered wages
Every disclosed offered wage on this employer's certified applications, in $5,000 bands.
25th $102,917 · median $111,500 · 75th $114,250 · 11 disclosed positions
Offered wages from certified Labor Condition Applications, grouped into $5,000 bands. Percentiles are computed from the bands, not from a stored average.
Outcomes
Derived at read time from the stored approval and denial counts. Nothing here is a stored rate.
- Approval rate
- 100.0%
- Approvals
- 11
- Denials
- 0
- Basis
- DOL decisions
US Department of Labor decisions on the applications, not petition outcomes.
11 adjudicated
Two different measurements. They are never blended into one rate.
A certified-then-withdrawn application was approved and pulled afterwards, so it counts as an approval. An application withdrawn before a decision was never adjudicated and is excluded from the denominator entirely — counting it as a denial would invent a rejection that never happened.
Every figure above is aggregated from Labor Condition Applications published by the US Department of Labor for NEUMERIC TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION as that name appears on the filings. Filing counts are applications, position counts are worker positions on those applications, and neither is a headcount or a count of visas granted. How these pages are built.
Looking for a different company with a similar name? Search every employer — same-named companies are listed separately, with the city and industry that tell them apart.